South American Natives Speak Ancient European Language? Part 2
Author: Kartavirya | Categories: Metahistory

News in brief

In 1966 the academy of Ecuador, which had entrusted a number of historians with the task of writing the history of Ecuador, suspended their commission, after having been convinced of the veracity of Moricz’ claims. A prominent historian of this group was Guillermo Segarra, who had already started learning to speak Hungarian and carried out his ancient homeland research with extraordinary devotion. It transpired that, when he still lacked a Hungarian dictionary he contacted Moricz in order to clarify whether or not the names BALIN and BALHUG, which occurred frequently in the AZUNY1) province, should be classified as belonging to the ancient Magyar names. Moricz joyfully informed him that these names corresponded to the family names BÁLINT and BALOGH respectively.

The Instituto de Antropologia y Geografia del Ecuador (Institute for Anthropology and Geography of Ecuador) also reached the conclusion that the ancient language wantonly exterminated by the Spanish was the Magyar language. The scientific journal of the institute is published under the name “Llacta” because it means “settlement” in the ancient language, that is, we (Magyars) could in our language of today call it “LAKTA”.2)

The city of Cuenca, which was built on the spot of the once-famous city of MÓR, is one of Ecuador’s most aristocratic cities. The inhabitants of Cuenca are proud of their high level of culture. The ancient inhabitants however still call themselves simply MORLACOS,3) that is, MÓRLAKÓ – “inhabitant of Mór”.

Mysterious Magyar-speaking tribes (clans)

The Saraguro tribe – which although it occurs in our chronicles still cannot be found with absolute certainty in the Carpathian Basin – is even today living their lives in large family units (familial clans) in Ecuador.

The language of the “Red Indians” living in the vicinity of Santo Domingo de los Colorados was ancient Magyar, which they still speak to this day.

Near the Colombian border, in the upper flow of the Santiago River, between the rivers Onzole and Cayapas lives the “Cayapas” tribe whose language is likewise ancient Magyar which they speak even today.

Beyond the Eastern Cordillera of Ecuador’s Andes Mountains, the tribes living deep in the ancient rain forests of Amazonas have managed to keep their ancient Magyar language, although escaping from the Spanish absolutism they had to give up many of their cultural achievements in order to keep their independence.

It will be very easy to ascertain the origins of the tribes and familial clans of the present-day Hungarian nation, due to the wise foresight on which basis families or clans were chosen for migration, so that only a part of every individual family or clan were brought over, in order that the family tree would not die out in the ancient homeland.

Moricz never uses the “hungaro” expression, which means Magyar in Spanish, but always writes and says Magyar. This became so entrenched in the Ecuadorians that on one occasion he was faced by two gentlemen who wanted him to resolve the argument that had developed between them. “Sir – said one of them – imagine that this gentleman dares to claim that the ‘hungaros’ are identical to the ‘magyars’. This was all we needed now: to confuse the ‘hungaros’ with the greatest people of the earth, the ‘magyars’! Can you imagine!” “Sir – said the other – I did not claim that they were identical, because this is impossible. I merely said, that as far as I know, some connection exists nevertheless between the ‘hungaros’ and the ‘magyars’.”


  1. Azuay ()
  2. ’Lak’ is the root word in Hungarian for anything to do with living quarters, apartments, settlements, habitation etc. ()
  3. I have found references to ‘morlacos’ in Cuenca, for instance, their local football team is nicknamed “Morlacos”. Also, a book called “Ecuador - Portrait of a People” by Albert B. Franklin, mentions a “land of the Morlacos.” ()

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

One Comment to “South American Natives Speak Ancient European Language? Part 2”

  1. Naddeo Michelangelo Says:

    THE EUROPEAN ORIGIN OF THE HUNGARIANS (Michelangelo.cn)

    Finding out where the Magyars came from was as simple as comparing the archaeological finds of the Honfoglalás time in Hungary with the finds of the areas where other cultural markers of the Magyars (see “Honfoglalás…”) had been found.
    Nobody had ever done it!

    Some 150 designs of some thousands of dated archaeological artefacts, cultural markers, and sacred symbols migrated from Bronze Age Europe to Arsia and back to Hungary. Furthermore these designs also reached China, Korea and Japan.

    The presence of similar designs and symbols in a large area of Eurasia in the time frame from the Neolithic (Gold Idol Civilization) to the middle of the last Millennium B.C. (Agglutinia, Pannonia and Magna Pannonia) is the evidence of the existence of the largest and most long living civilization ever on earth. The civilization of Agglutinia (from Hungary to Oxiana, 3rd millennium B.C) started fading with the arrival of the Semites in Mesopotamia, and of the Indo-Europeans in India and Europe. Wherever these populations arrived, the same pattern of events was experienced, starting with the disappearance of the ancient sacred symbols. Those sacred symbols survived only in Pannonia, and later on in Magna Pannonia until the middle of the last millennium B.C.. Only at this time, the Celto-Pannonici and other “Indo-Europeans” differentiated and separated from the Pannonici. In fact, most of the artefacts found in Europe before 500 B.C. (and labelled “Celtic”, “Greek, Geometric”, “Etruscan, Orientalising”) are congruent with the previous millennia of Pannonico Art and shall reappear in Europe later on with the Magyars. (No artefact, symbol, or design can be labelled “Celtic” or “Greek” if it existed in Europe along the previous millennia!).

    The civilization of Magna Pannonia extended, from the middle of the second to the middle of the last millennium B.C., from Pribaltika to Pannoniberia and from England to the Aegean Sea.

    Around 1000 B.C. a population located in the Eastern part of the Carpathian area migrated to the Altai region and, later on, found a refugium in the Tarim Basin when the Huns came out of the Dzungarian Gate. The artefacts excavated in Pazyryk and Esik, and those collected by Marc Aurel Stein (a Hungarian!) in the Tarim Basin, are the best proof of that migration from Europe. The conscience of the common identity of the Central Asian and Balkan populations was clearly stated by the chief of the “Scythians” of Central Asia. He warned Alexander the Great not to attack his people “because Scythia borders Greece”. (He was threatening a retaliation of the Balkan “Scythians” against Greece). (Anabasis, Xenophon).

    At the end of the first millennium A.D., the sudden reappearance in Europe of those same Bronze Age ancient designs and religious symbols, which had disappeared from Europe since longer than a millennium, and of artefacts similar to those collected by Stein, is the best evidence of their migration from Pannonia to Central Asia and back to the Carpathian Basin. The relevance of the designs and artefacts that the Magyars brought back with them resides in their sacred symbolism, which had kept unchanged along the two millennia the Magyars had lived in Central Asia. The art of the Magyars was still symbolic, the God of the Magyars (Isten) was still not anthropomorphic, the only God of the Magyars was still a Goddess, which had been represented in the same way along 5 millennia: while giving birth. The Ainu have only recently, reluctantly, started carving anthropomorphic figurines and dolls to be sold to tourists, in order to make a living: their designs are still the same as those the Magyars carved in Central Asia. The few Ainu still surviving in Japan are the closest cultural brothers of the Magyars.

    The comparison of archaeological finds allows to define with great accuracy the borders of the territories in which the Magyars had lived from the beginning of the 1st millennium B.C. to the time in which they started their travel back to Hungary. The Avars had left the Tarim Basin earlier than the Magyars and had spent more time on the way: their Art (Transitional Art) had already lost part of the traditional symbolism that the Magyars will later bring to Europe.

Comment: